← Recap journal

Settled model recap · 2026-09-15

MLB Pitcher Prop Picks Recap for September 15, 2026: 3-4, -1.67 units

Review 7 pitcher-prop Picks from September 15, 2026 with the exact saved sportsbook prices, model probabilities, lineup or player values, final results, and plain-English postgame review.

Published after the saved Picks settled. The original prices and inputs stay attached.

Record3-4-0
Net units-1.67u
Game Picks0
Player Props7

One-minute recap

One-minute recap

The card missed: 7 pitcher-prop Picks finished 3-4 for -1.67 units. The useful question is which assumptions failed, not how to explain the result after the fact.

Saved Picks and reviews

Open any Pick for the why

MLB Player Props

7 pitcher-prop Picks, covering strikeouts, pitching outs and reviewed from the saved workload, opponent, and price snapshots.

Pitcher prop

Jacob Misiorowski Under 8.5 strikeouts

MIL at PIT · 7 strikeouts · under 8.5

DraftKings -141winSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Decision coverage note

Decision coverage was incomplete in the pitcher strikeout lane (8 opportunities expired despite a prior decision opportunity) and the additional pitcher props lane (23 opportunities expired without a decision). This recap is complete for the 7 settled Picks that were actually recorded, but the slate does not meet full-lifecycle acceptance. No missing decision was reconstructed, and these incidents do not count as Picks or change the record above.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability75.8%
Price break-even58.5%
Calculated difference+17.3 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Jacob Misiorowski vs. PIT

Projected Ks
6.5
Actual Ks
7
Pitcher value62.7
Opponent K matchup81.1
Lineup K rate23.3%
Lineup coverage100%
Projected batters faced22.6
Evidence quality91%

Pitcher and opponent values use the frozen 0–100 rolling scale. Projection standard deviation: 2.78 Ks. Robustness: 79%.

Pitcher prop

Yoshinobu Yamamoto Under 7.5 strikeouts

LAD at CIN · 7 strikeouts · under 7.5

FanDuel -108winSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Won: Jacob Misiorowski Under 8.5 Ks

Jacob Misiorowski finished with 7 strikeouts, cashing the saved under 8.5 and adding +0.71 units to the prop record.

At DraftKings -141, the model gave the under 75.8% against a 58.5% break-even mark, a +17.3-point gap. The saved projection was 6.5 strikeouts across 22.6 batters faced. The pitcher graded 62.7/100 and the opponent strikeout matchup graded 81.1; the confirmed lineup carried a 23.3% strikeout rate.

The actual result finished 0.5 strikeouts above the point projection. The ticket and the point projection told the same story. We will compare the same workload, opponent, line, and price profile before changing production weights.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability66.2%
Price break-even51.9%
Calculated difference+14.3 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs. CIN

Projected Ks
6.4
Actual Ks
7
Pitcher value57.1
Opponent K matchup64.7
Lineup K rate26.0%
Lineup coverage100%
Projected batters faced25.1
Evidence quality91%

Pitcher and opponent values use the frozen 0–100 rolling scale. Projection standard deviation: 2.77 Ks. Robustness: 79%.

Pitcher prop

Martin Perez Over 3.5 strikeouts

ATL at CHC · 2 strikeouts · over 3.5

Fanatics Sportsbook +120lossSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Won: Yoshinobu Yamamoto Under 7.5 Ks

Yoshinobu Yamamoto finished with 7 strikeouts, cashing the saved under 7.5 and adding +0.93 units to the prop record.

At FanDuel -108, the model gave the under 66.2% against a 51.9% break-even mark, a +14.3-point gap. The saved projection was 6.4 strikeouts across 25.1 batters faced. The pitcher graded 57.1/100 and the opponent strikeout matchup graded 64.7; the confirmed lineup carried a 26.0% strikeout rate.

The actual result finished 0.6 strikeouts above the point projection. The ticket and the point projection told the same story. We will compare the same workload, opponent, line, and price profile before changing production weights.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability62.1%
Price break-even45.5%
Calculated difference+16.6 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Martin Perez vs. CHC

Projected Ks
4.5
Actual Ks
2
Pitcher value49.7
Opponent K matchup35.0
Lineup K rate20.3%
Lineup coverage100%
Projected batters faced23.1
Evidence quality91%

Pitcher and opponent values use the frozen 0–100 rolling scale. Projection standard deviation: 2.26 Ks. Robustness: 78%.

Pitcher prop

Kyle Freeland Over 2.5 strikeouts

SD at COL · 1 strikeouts · over 2.5

BetMGM -120lossSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Lost: Martin Perez Over 3.5 Ks

Martin Perez finished with 2 strikeouts, leaving the saved over 3.5 on the wrong side of the line for a 1.00-unit loss.

At Fanatics Sportsbook +120, the model gave the over 62.1% against a 45.5% break-even mark, a +16.6-point gap. The saved projection was 4.5 strikeouts across 23.1 batters faced. The pitcher graded 49.7/100 and the opponent strikeout matchup graded 35.0; the confirmed lineup carried a 20.3% strikeout rate.

The actual result finished 2.5 strikeouts below the point projection. The projection supported the ticket, but the actual result crossed to the other side of the sportsbook line. We will compare the same workload, opponent, line, and price profile before changing production weights.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability82.7%
Price break-even54.5%
Calculated difference+28.2 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Kyle Freeland vs. SD

Projected Ks
4.9
Actual Ks
1
Pitcher value47.7
Opponent K matchup40.7
Lineup K rate21.8%
Lineup coverage100%
Projected batters faced23.7
Evidence quality91%

Pitcher and opponent values use the frozen 0–100 rolling scale. Projection standard deviation: 2.37 Ks. Robustness: 77%.

Pitcher prop

Jack Perkins Over 14.5 pitching outs

OAK at TB · 20 outs · over 14.5

FanDuel -144winSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Lost: Kyle Freeland Over 2.5 Ks

Kyle Freeland finished with 1 strikeouts, leaving the saved over 2.5 on the wrong side of the line for a 1.00-unit loss.

At BetMGM -120, the model gave the over 82.7% against a 54.5% break-even mark, a +28.2-point gap. The saved projection was 4.9 strikeouts across 23.7 batters faced. The pitcher graded 47.7/100 and the opponent strikeout matchup graded 40.7; the confirmed lineup carried a 21.8% strikeout rate.

The actual result finished 3.9 strikeouts below the point projection. The projection supported the ticket, but the actual result crossed to the other side of the sportsbook line. We will compare the same workload, opponent, line, and price profile before changing production weights.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability90.8%
Price break-even59.0%
Calculated difference+31.8 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Jack Perkins vs. TB

Projected outs
20.1
Actual outs
20
Projected opportunities30.0
Pitcher rate66.2%
Opponent rate66.3%
Stability93%
Evidence quality95%
Uncertaintystandard
Pitcher prop

Foster Griffin Over 15.5 pitching outs

CWS at CLE · 12 outs · over 15.5

Bovada +130lossSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Won: Jack Perkins Over 14.5 pitching outs

Jack Perkins finished with 20 outs, cashing the saved over 14.5 at FanDuel -144 for +0.69 units.

The model priced the over at 90.8% versus a 59.0% break-even mark. The actual finished 0.1 outs below the saved 20.1 projection. The workload estimate was 30.0 opportunities, with pitcher rate 66.2% and opponent rate 66.3%.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability57.3%
Price break-even43.5%
Calculated difference+13.8 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Foster Griffin vs. CWS

Projected outs
16.2
Actual outs
12
Projected opportunities23.2
Pitcher rate71.8%
Opponent rate67.3%
Stability93%
Evidence quality95%
Uncertaintystandard
Pitcher prop

Logan Gilbert Under 17.5 pitching outs

SEA at LAA · 18 outs · under 17.5

Bovada +140lossSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Lost: Foster Griffin Over 15.5 pitching outs

Foster Griffin finished with 12 outs. That put the saved over 15.5 on the wrong side for a 1.00-unit loss.

The model priced the over at 57.3% versus a 43.5% break-even mark. The actual finished 4.2 outs below the saved 16.2 projection. The workload estimate was 23.2 opportunities, with pitcher rate 71.8% and opponent rate 67.3%.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability56.5%
Price break-even41.7%
Calculated difference+14.8 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Logan Gilbert vs. LAA

Projected outs
17.0
Actual outs
18
Projected opportunities23.7
Pitcher rate74.0%
Opponent rate69.5%
Stability95%
Evidence quality95%
Uncertaintystandard

Lost: Logan Gilbert Under 17.5 pitching outs

Logan Gilbert finished with 18 outs. That put the saved under 17.5 on the wrong side for a 1.00-unit loss.

The model priced the under at 56.5% versus a 41.7% break-even mark. The actual finished 1.0 outs above the saved 17.0 projection. The workload estimate was 23.7 opportunities, with pitcher rate 74.0% and opponent rate 69.5%.

What comes next

What we take forward

Each result can raise a useful question, but no single game rewrites the model. Any adjustment has to repeat across comparable frozen reads and survive a prospective test first.

Technical receipt

Fact pack: e92b19e245fffeaff4c990814bab7c524c668fcb7da4180f283e709e6ead30bc

Decision receipts: mlb-k-prop-68b6d635dfb3eea866c0836d, mlb-k-prop-ce62e72f7d7178a93c97349d, mlb-k-prop-685d1ae14fcf8132ad19a311, mlb-k-prop-72736bd1987ceb0b10e80ba3, mlb-added-prop-901eefedcb12ea78d2058271, mlb-added-prop-da14912a0a9c7f4a6338477b, mlb-added-prop-0006126009a665285d55c2a0

Settlement receipts: 2b156538bef3bb54e3409cbd2c8a61794cde4da21dc1745f9cfcbd34c8e1c81b, f79c4afe0f1ae362d43e15cccc2ad0b6a76e3342320c56eca86386540533b553, 0e83300bc035515f2b19410b5ec495f57dbc0c65456b2ec7143ea60903d350a3, b7d12d20d293b5ddec3ebbbd6444cd9f69226eb1679f839bc0720d4c7adc53f2, eda077531b61cb47a3ade0e405d80c49e1031e9ba2b557d3a6d8b2e247ed5586, 50b62db9574c408b7753c5371764c8f5795eb6bc784a52d31ba79d00dcd69b80, 0926b74e3f10ca0575db16d987d80644c86a32fce7dfa4224dfe08a7fc674c7b