← Recap journal

Settled model recap · 2026-09-14

MLB Pitcher Prop Picks Recap for September 14, 2026: 1-2, -0.88 units

Review 3 pitcher-prop Picks from September 14, 2026 with the exact saved sportsbook prices, model probabilities, lineup or player values, final results, and plain-English postgame review.

Published after the saved Picks settled. The original prices and inputs stay attached.

Record1-2-0
Net units-0.88u
Game Picks0
Player Props3

One-minute recap

One-minute recap

The card missed: 3 pitcher-prop Picks finished 1-2 for -0.88 units. The useful question is which assumptions failed, not how to explain the result after the fact.

Saved Picks and reviews

Open any Pick for the why

MLB Player Props

3 pitcher-prop Picks, covering strikeouts, pitching outs and reviewed from the saved workload, opponent, and price snapshots.

Pitcher prop

Tarik Skubal Under 7.5 strikeouts

LAD at CIN · 9 strikeouts · under 7.5

BetMGM +105lossSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Decision coverage note

Decision coverage was incomplete in the pitcher strikeout lane (5 opportunities expired despite a prior decision opportunity) and the additional pitcher props lane (19 opportunities expired without a decision). This recap is complete for the 3 settled Picks that were actually recorded, but the slate does not meet full-lifecycle acceptance. No missing decision was reconstructed, and these incidents do not count as Picks or change the record above.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability67.1%
Price break-even48.8%
Calculated difference+18.3 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Tarik Skubal vs. CIN

Projected Ks
6.3
Actual Ks
9
Pitcher value62.3
Opponent K matchup70.5
Lineup K rate25.4%
Lineup coverage100%
Projected batters faced23.8
Evidence quality91%

Pitcher and opponent values use the frozen 0–100 rolling scale. Projection standard deviation: 2.75 Ks. Robustness: 78%.

Pitcher prop

David Peterson Over 4.5 strikeouts

ATL at CHC · 7 strikeouts · over 4.5

DraftKings +112winSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Lost: Tarik Skubal Under 7.5 Ks

Tarik Skubal finished with 9 strikeouts, leaving the saved under 7.5 on the wrong side of the line for a 1.00-unit loss.

At BetMGM +105, the model gave the under 67.1% against a 48.8% break-even mark, a +18.3-point gap. The saved projection was 6.3 strikeouts across 23.8 batters faced. The pitcher graded 62.3/100 and the opponent strikeout matchup graded 70.5; the confirmed lineup carried a 25.4% strikeout rate.

The actual result finished 2.7 strikeouts above the point projection. The projection supported the ticket, but the actual result crossed to the other side of the sportsbook line. We will compare the same workload, opponent, line, and price profile before changing production weights.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability66.6%
Price break-even47.2%
Calculated difference+19.5 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

David Peterson vs. ATL

Projected Ks
6.0
Actual Ks
7
Pitcher value49.6
Opponent K matchup42.4
Lineup K rate21.8%
Lineup coverage100%
Projected batters faced28.4
Evidence quality91%

Pitcher and opponent values use the frozen 0–100 rolling scale. Projection standard deviation: 2.67 Ks. Robustness: 78%.

Pitcher prop

Brandon Young Over 15.5 pitching outs

BAL at NYM · 15 outs · over 15.5

DraftKings +103lossSee the review ↓

Postgame review

Won: David Peterson Over 4.5 Ks

David Peterson finished with 7 strikeouts, cashing the saved over 4.5 and adding +1.12 units to the prop record.

At DraftKings +112, the model gave the over 66.6% against a 47.2% break-even mark, a +19.5-point gap. The saved projection was 6.0 strikeouts across 28.4 batters faced. The pitcher graded 49.6/100 and the opponent strikeout matchup graded 42.4; the confirmed lineup carried a 21.8% strikeout rate.

The actual result finished 1.0 strikeouts above the point projection. The ticket and the point projection told the same story. We will compare the same workload, opponent, line, and price profile before changing production weights.

Saved pregame inputs

Model probability61.5%
Price break-even49.3%
Calculated difference+12.3 pts

Frozen pitcher-prop inputs

Brandon Young vs. NYM

Projected outs
16.6
Actual outs
15
Projected opportunities24.1
Pitcher rate69.0%
Opponent rate68.1%
Stability93%
Evidence quality95%
Uncertaintystandard

Lost: Brandon Young Over 15.5 pitching outs

Brandon Young finished with 15 outs. That put the saved over 15.5 on the wrong side for a 1.00-unit loss.

The model priced the over at 61.5% versus a 49.3% break-even mark. The actual finished 1.6 outs below the saved 16.6 projection. The workload estimate was 24.1 opportunities, with pitcher rate 69.0% and opponent rate 68.1%.

What comes next

What we take forward

Each result can raise a useful question, but no single game rewrites the model. Any adjustment has to repeat across comparable frozen reads and survive a prospective test first.

Technical receipt

Fact pack: 3baac58b679a0109bb17390711e6a78ec47134b1638f9ec2d52f1fccb2dd7b14

Decision receipts: mlb-k-prop-9157925f8bf954b475343be8, mlb-k-prop-c860664e613682a5c896038f, mlb-added-prop-ff6611c12053e871b265200f

Settlement receipts: b847cd99bc85e30e3ba87edd25ca24fccbe9ba672a63964e4f06d57781dc02ea, 474543afc43a5b60c3f8def16735975d691bf9bae6bdcbf749456e30d1e21edb, 817bc756bcdac70caf5e252f104c9cf22a38db485ce2079c940fb5e759bb1226